The 2006 Session: The Legislature in Africa’s
Democratic Transition
The wave of popular pressures for political
reform that spread across Africa in the period stretching from the late
1980s to the mid-1990s culminated in the restoration of electoral pluralism
in most of the countries of the continent. This development went
hand-in-hand with the adoption of constitutional frames that, nominally at
least, guaranteed an important role in governance to the legislative arm of
government. The particular form, content and scope which legislative power
and mandate took differed from country to country, as did the structuring of
its relations with the executive and judicial arms of government. However,
in every African country, as democratic forms of politics were re-introduced
on the back of the collapse of military and single party rule, there was a
strong accent placed, formally at least, on the role of the legislature in
the building and consolidation of democracy. Implicit in this was the
position, broadly, shared, that the legislature is the embodiment of the
sovereignty of the people. In this role, it was expected not only to make
laws for the welfare of the generality of the populace but also to serve
both as a democratically-empowered agency of restraint on the executive arm
of government and a forum for the mobilisation of popular participation in
the broad governmental process. Needless to say, the robustness with which
it could carry out its functions was always going to be a function of its
ability to maintain a degree of internal coherence, relative autonomy
vis-à-vis the executive arm, and proximity to the pulse of the electorate.
Also important is the extent to which the legislature is itself
representative as an institution that captures the diversities of society.
Ordinarily, the important role assigned to the
legislature in the renewed quest for democratic governance in Africa, and
the high hopes of the populace in the office of the elected representative
are issues which should be considered a routine part of democratic politics.
However, in the context of Africa, they carried an added significance
deriving from the fact that the legislative arm of government was perhaps
the biggest loser from the decades of military and single party rule that
pervaded Africa from the second half of the 1960s to the mid-1990s. All over
the continent, as political authoritarianism took hold, the legislature was
either proscribed outrightly or completely subordinated to the executive arm
of government; legislative politics came to be severely underdeveloped in
every sense. It is in part because of this underdevelopment that many
(donor) initiatives were introduced in the period from the 1990s onwards to
“build the capacity” of parliament in different parts of Africa. And without
doubt, there were, indeed, technical capacities in need of being developed.
But clearly, the issues arising from the weaknesses of the legislature are
not simply or only technical in nature; in fact, they are mainly – and
perhaps overwhelmingly political in nature. These problems have manifested
themselves in a variety of ways, including through the struggles for
relative autonomy from the executive, tensions arising from the tendency
towards presidentialism in Africa’s new democracies, the instability and
fragmentation of political parties, the poor structuring of the relationship
between elected legislators and party bosses, the easy vulnerability of
electoral systems to various kinds of manipulation, the frequent resort by
the executive to a “security” cover for riding roughshod over parliament,
the under-funding of parliament and poor harnessing of the funds available
for deepening the foundations of democratic politics, the erosion of the
domestic policy environment by donor conditionality, etc. In many ways, the
institutional experiences of the legislature in the contemporary quest for
democratic renewal both mirrors and summarises the entire record of the
politics of the democratic process itself.
Objectives
Through the 2006 Governance Institute, the
Council proposes to focus scholarly attention on parliament both as an
institutional expression of and an arena in Africa’s quest for democratic
governance. Prospective participants will be encouraged to review existing
debates on the role and place of the legislative arm of government in
contemporary African politics, produce fresh empirical and analytic
insights, engage in a comparative analysis of their findings and reflect on
the challenges posed by their own work to inherited/dominant conceptual
frames. The legislature as an arena of debate is a minefield of information
on the different political trends, tendencies and struggles of the day in
any country; laureates of the 2006 Governance institute will be encouraged
to read the politics of democratisation in contemporary Africa as seen
through the lenses of parliament. But they will also be challenged to
identify the silences that may be in evidence in the legislative debates
that occur.